ShareThis Page

Former Consol offices in Upper St. Clair fall to demolition

| Friday, Oct. 19, 2012, 12:18 a.m.
Old CONSOL building being torn down in Upper St. Clair Thursday, October 18, 2012.
Old CONSOL building being torn down in Upper St. Clair Thursday, October 18, 2012.
Old CONSOL building being torn down Thursday, October 18, 2012.
Old CONSOL building being torn down Thursday, October 18, 2012.
Old CONSOL building being torn down Thursday, October 18, 2012.
Old CONSOL building being torn down Thursday, October 18, 2012.

Contractors have begun demolition of the former Consol Energy headquarters off Washington Road in Upper St. Clair, but developers who proposed building stores and houses on the 28-acre property have not filed formal plans with the township.

Upper St. Clair issued a demolition permit this month, said Planning Director Scott Brilhart, and demolition of the 175,000-square-foot office building across from South Hills Village mall began last week.

Last year, developers Jerry Cipriani and Hal Kestler outlined plans for retail use along the Washington Road portion of the property. Condominiums, townhouses or single-family homes would be built in the rear, off Fort Couch Road, but they have not yet begun the process of submitting details to the township for approval.

Cipriani and Kestler could not be reached for comment.

“They haven't submitted anything yet, but we know they're working with a landscape architect and working on a master plan,” said Brilhart. “I believe they'll be submitting something in the near future.”

Township commissioners last year approved making mixed-use development a possibility in the Special Business zoning that covers the former Consol property. They used what's called a “text amendment” that covers only the acreage at issue.

Consol sold the land and building in 2008 and moved to Southpointe in Cecil.

During the eight months of hearings that resulted in the amendment, residents voiced concerns that the development would generate too much traffic, could create unsightly “big box” development in an area rife with those, and could have tenants drawing people considered undesirable in the well-to-do bedroom community.

Two residents, Jarrod Shaw and Moira Cain-Mannix, went to court over whether the township properly had notified neighbors about the proposed zoning changes.

An Allegheny County Common Pleas Court judge denied their appeal in July, but they appealed that decision to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Matthew Santoni is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-380-5625 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me