Minnesota State Fair shoots down doughnuts paired with syringes | TribLIVE.com

Minnesota State Fair shoots down doughnuts paired with syringes

Steven Adams
Minnesota State Fair
Minnesota State Fair shoots down controversial doughnuts with a side of syringes.

Minnesota fairgoers this summer will being dunkin’ their doughnuts instead of injecting them.

One of the new foods slated for the 2019 Minnesota State Fair had been a batch of fill-your-own doughnuts. Well, those little spherical doughnut holes, actually.

The filling were to be Bavarian cream, chocolate custard and Minnesota lingonberry jam and the injection method was to be plastic syringes.

Who would love this idea? It turns out 3,300 people signed the Change.org petition against the sweet treats.

It was the side of syringes that turned people off for two reasons: The single-use plastic injectors were not eco-friendly and the process evoked the image of drug use.

The online petition was titled “Stop the Minnesota State Fair from allowing Wingwalker Donut to use plastic syringes!” and apparently worked because organizers this week pulled the item from their page of new fair foods, reports the Star Tribune.

The doughnuts will instead be offered in a compostable serving tray with a trio of compartments for the fillings, the Star Tribune reports. Customers will be dipping the doughnut holes in the fillings.

Read more of the story at StarTribune.com.

Steven Adams is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Steven at 412-380-5645 or [email protected].

Categories: Lifestyles | Food Drink | Travel
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.