Vegan man sues Burger King over Impossible Whopper |
Food & Drink

Vegan man sues Burger King over Impossible Whopper

Frank Carnevale
An Impossible Whopper sits on a table at a Burger King restaurant on April 1, 2019 in Richmond Heights, Missouri.

Burger King is being sued by a vegan customer who said the company does not state that the meatless Impossible Whoppers are cooked on the same grills as other burgers.

According to CNN, the class action lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida claims that although the chain advertises its vegan option as meat-free, the Whopper is contaminated by meat by-products because it’s prepared on the same grills as meat products.

Burger King, which describes the Impossible Whopper as “100% Whopper, 0% Beef” on its website, also includes a note saying, “For guests looking for a meat-free option, a non-broiler method of preparation is available upon request.”

When the plant-based burger was announced in the spring, reps for the company said that customers could ask for the patties to be prepared in the oven. But the product still cannot be labeled vegan as Burger King restaurants “have an open kitchen environment,” according to Fox News.

Most people following a vegan or vegetarian diet try to avoid animal products in all cooking and preparation of dishes.

The plaintiff in the case, Phillip Williams, said he purchased an Impossible Whopper at a location in Atlanta in August. He said that if he had known the burger would be cooked on the same grill as other burgers, he would have not purchased it.

CBS News reported that Williams said he saw “no signage” about Impossible Whoppers being cooked on the same grill, a situation he called “deceptive” in his lawsuit.

Burger King has not commented on the lawsuit.

The Impossible Whopper has been a success for Burger King in a year that has seen a big spike in fast-food chains and restaurants offering vegan and meat-free options to their customers.

Frank Carnevale is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Frank via Twitter .

Categories: Lifestyles | Food Drink
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.