ShareThis Page
Food & Drink

Pittsburgh no longer in top 10 of best cities for beer drinkers

| Tuesday, Jan. 2, 2018, 12:09 p.m.

Last year at this time, Pittsburghers could revel in the fact that the city was at No. 3 on SmartAsset's 2016 list of best cities for beer drinkers .

But this year? We've fallen to No. 12.

And with all the breweries opening this year, you'd think we would have been in contention for the top spot.

"Pittsburgh's drop from third to 12th is largely due to lower Yelp ratings for breweries and higher prices for beer," SmartAsset's Kara Gibson tells . "In our 2016 study, the average brewery in Pittsburgh had a Yelp rating of 4.31 and this year that rating fell to 4.16.

"Additionally, the average price for a pint of domestic draft beer increased from $3 in the 2016 study to $3.75 in the 2017 study."

While Pittsburgh added one microbrewery in 2017, other cities added more — Cincinnati added six.

SmartAsset looked at a number of data factors in 300 cities across the country.

"First we ranked each city in each metric," the site says. "We then found each city's average ranking, giving the price of draft beer and average Yelp score a half weight. We double weighted the total number of breweries. Using this average ranking, we created our final score. The city with the best average ranking received a score of 100 and the city with the worst average ranking received a 0."

Seems like 2018 is Pittsburgh's year to step it up, suds-wise.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me