ShareThis Page
Food & Drink

Students petition Bethel Park schools to stock Sprite Cranberry

Chris Pastrick
| Friday, Nov. 30, 2018, 10:45 a.m.

The struggle is real.

That’s if you classify getting your school cafeteria to serve Sprite Cranberry a “struggle.”

And, apparently, more than a few students in the Bethel Park School District do — more than 550, actually.

That’s how many have signed a Change.org petition to get the refreshing citrus beverage added to the district’s cafeterias.

The petition seems to have originated with a Ryan Nebiolo, who says he’s a student at Bethel Park High School. “For so long me and other peers have wished for Sprite Cranberry in the cafeterias, but have gotten no results.”

So, Ryan decided to take action. And who can blame him or his peers?

With a tart twist of cranberry added to Sprite’s signature lemon-lime taste, the seasonal-only offering is just delightful. So says the internet.

Only a few weeks ago, budgiebee wrote on Amazon, “The cranberry flavor is very light. It’s fresh and crisp tasting. Will be ordering frequently.”

Nita burcham said, “My nephew is eleven and loved it.”

On the Canadian product review site ChickAdvisor, celiag wrote, “The taste is so refreshing, with just a hint of cranberries. It is the same price as all other sprite products, but much better in my opinion.”

That’s right, celiag — same price, all that extra taste. Sprite knows what it’s doing.

“Sprite Cranberry has become a non-traditional favorite for the holidays and a must-have for festive gatherings,” Bobby Oliver, Sprite’s brand director, says of the drink that debuted in 2013.

We wish Ryan all the luck in his mission. Who knows, maybe he can even get the school to kick in for Sprite Zero Cranberry.

Aim high, right?

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at 724-226-4697, cpastrick@tribweb.com or via Twitter @CPastrickTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me