‘Competitive readers’ duke it out in Battle of the Books | TribLIVE.com
More Lifestyles

‘Competitive readers’ duke it out in Battle of the Books

Mary Pickels
1534348_web1_Battle-of-the-books--2-
Courtesy of Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh
Participants scramble for answers during an earlier Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh Battle of the Books event.

There is no skimming for the 29 teams competing in Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh’s Battle of the Books.

Teams of three to five people need to read — thoroughly — the list of books “assigned” each year.

“The questions are really hard,” says Dan Hensley, the library’s adult programming coordinator.

Ehrrin Keenan is not scared.

“I’m a big reader and I love competitions. It’s like competitive reading,” she says of the book battles.

It’s her team’s second time competing, after taking second place in 2017.

Keenan, of Elliott in Pittsburgh’s West End, is a library volunteer who has worked with the teen Battle of the Books program.

“It was so fun,” she says.

Adults demand equal time

This year is the third for the adult version, Hensley says, formed after parents, teachers and volunteers like Keenan asked for a battle of their own.

Five selected authors come from the Pittsburgh Arts and Lectures’s upcoming Ten Evenings, along with another five featured in past organization events.

The library provides copies of the books, which this year include “Little Fires Everywhere” by Celeste Ng, “The Underground Railroad” by Colson Whitehead, “Another Brooklyn” by Jacqueline Woodson, “Circe” by Madeline Miller and “There, There” by Tommy Orange.

A committee of librarians select each year’s books, Hensley explains.

Team members typically split the 10 books among the members.

The library plans trivia nights at Wigle Whiskey Barrelhouse on Aug. 21 and 28 and at Threadbare Cider House on Aug. 22 and 29.

Reading for pleasure, sport

Captain of the Margaret N’Atwood: The Leading Menschen of Reading Comprehension team, Keenan and her team will face off with challengers during the Aug. 21 event.

The five women are inspired by soccer standout Megan Rapinoe and Martha Atwood, author of the popular “The Handmaid’s Tale.”

A twist on Pittsburghese — n’at — is the team name’s inspiration.

“I think its a really fun way to encourage people to read books they might not have picked up otherwise,” she says of the book battle.

“I’ve learned so much about the library through varied opportunities. I’m kind of an evangelist. There are so many resources — books and so much more,” Keenan says.

Hensley says it’s part of the library’s efforts to create social events centered on its readers. “We know a book club is not going to work for everyone,” he says.

Some teams have kept the same members for three years. Some are parents and adult children, others are teachers whose students have participated in the past and some are librarians from other libraries in the area, Hensley says. Team cheering sections at the events are encouraged, he adds.

And if Team Margaret N’Atwood wins?

“We’ll all do the Megan Rapinoe power stance,” Keenan says.

Mary Pickels is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-836-5401, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: AandE | Books | More Lifestyles
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.