I’m mad my sister invited her stepson’s ex-wife to family reunion | TribLIVE.com
More Lifestyles

I’m mad my sister invited her stepson’s ex-wife to family reunion

Carolyn Hax
1125646_web1_gtr-LIV-hax

Dear Carolyn:

I am the middle sister of three. My older sister suggested we have a family reunion, and we decided we would have it at my house. We also decided to make one day a surprise celebration of the youngest sister’s retirement. There will be approximately 16 people, including children, over five days, with some coming and going at different times.

Yesterday, my younger sister called to inform me she had invited her stepson’s ex-wife, explaining, “Well, she’s family.” Well, she isn’t related to anyone there; I don’t consider her family. I “slept on it” hoping to get over my annoyance, but still feel the same.

I certainly won’t call her back and tell her to uninvite this person, but am I justified, or overreacting?

— Always in the Middle

It would have been a kindness for your sister to tell you of her intentions before she invited her ex-daughter-in-law.

But that’s about all the backing I can offer for your resentment, which I suspect is by proxy, but I’ll get to that.

You are the host, of course — but a reunion is not, “I’m bringing us all together,” it’s, “We’re bringing ourselves together and I’m (graciously!) volunteering to house everyone.” So for one of you to widen the circle a bit to make room for an extra family member is not the violation it would be if you were having, say, a dinner party.

Plus, your sister’s plus-one is an inclusive gesture, well in keeping with the spirit of a reunion. Just because the law says this woman is no longer related to your sister doesn’t mean they can’t regard each other as family.

Given your generosity in offering your home, I suspect you’d have no problem embracing such inclusion if you: liked this sister more; liked this ex-relative more; felt less overwhelmed by the coming stampede; or felt better about your standing within the family pecking order. Or a little of all four.

Because taking issue with one extra person over a family-tie technicality? That’s so small. Especially considering this weekend is, in part, a celebration of this sister, so including “her” people would not only make more sense, but also be a lovely part of the surprise.

So that’s why you have me thinking proxy complaint: meaning, you were already generally and even subconsciously anxious, and so when this plus-one issue presented itself as a convenient receptacle for all those misgivings, you dumped them right in. We’ve all been there; it’s tempting.

Your signature is what got my attention most: “Always in the Middle.” In four words, you admit seeing this as the latest chapter in a long-running tale of frustration with the sisterhood, not as a one-time thing.

So. My advice about the extra guest is to repeat to yourself, “The more the merrier,” until you start to believe it. Or, even better, “Blood doesn’t make families, hearts do.”

I also urge you to be clear and unflinching in delegating most — I repeat, most — of the hosting work; merely preparing your home before and reclaiming it after represents more than one person’s share. Huddle with both sisters to assign meals, cleanups, errands, expenses, all of it. One benefit of being house-not-host: You needn’t martyr yourself to everyone else’s fun.

And my advice for the extra resentment is to identify — or if you already know it well, acknowledge — the true source of your annoyance, and address that instead of dwelling on the plus-one. Or, choose not to address it! But do so consciously and for good, so you don’t spend the whole reunion (and thereafter) booby-trapped with old grudges, sore spots and pique.

•••

Dear Carolyn:

I overdrink just about every time I imbibe, but my personality changes in a “positive” way: I get really happy. My wife doesn’t think I have a problem probably because of that, as I have a stressful job and can be a bit of a crank (I acknowledge this). I only drink once a week at most, but I feel awful the next morning and hate myself the rest of the weekend. But I have no support. When I raise the possibility of stopping drinking with my wife or friends, they get defensive for me and tell me I’m fine. Am I an alcoholic?

— Overdrinking

You don’t need a label, you need professional support.

Get some, please, by asking your primary care physician for treatment referrals. Treat both the alcohol abuse and those feelings you’re self-medicating with alcohol abuse.

And, explain to your wife that you hate yourself after you drink, so you’re stopping. Explain that her assuring you you’re fine and don’t need to stop is not helpful right now. Then spell out for her the support you do want. Then hope she hears you but expect her not to.

I realize this is short advice for a long journey, but it could really be five words:

I believe you. Get help.

And take care.

Email Carolyn at [email protected], follow her on Facebook or chat with her online at noon each Friday at washingtonpost.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.