Son asks his mom to stay in a hotel, she’s not having it | TribLIVE.com
More Lifestyles

Son asks his mom to stay in a hotel, she’s not having it

Carolyn Hax
1653739_web1_gtr-LIV-hax

Dear Carolyn:

I’m a 70-year-old mom of a 35-year-old, newly married son, my only child. What are your thoughts about his telling me that if I visit them, I need to stay in a hotel? I would only visit if invited of course. I visited him before and stayed in his apartment. Prior to that, he lived in a different city, and said if I visited, I needed to stay in a hotel. I didn’t visit him there.

As explanation or support he writes only that all his friends have their families stay in hotels. Just a by-the-way: I know lots of his friends and this isn’t true. My son and his wife host their out-of-town friends in their second bedroom with a comfy sofa bed. I’ve emailed back that I, like the rest of my family and everyone else I know, aren’t people who stay in hotels on short family visits. I think I also wrote that such a visit would engender not-good memories for me (I have too many to ignore already).

I don’t know his wife well. We haven’t chatted or spent time together just us two. She has a warm personality, many friends and writes me friendly thank-you notes for gifts I send her. (I always email her first to ask if she’d like whatever it is.) It’s been that way since we met and I don’t have a judgment or opinion about what our lack of closeness is about.

I 100% get that other families happily do stay in hotels for excellent reasons. I may change my thoughts, like if my son has children or whatever (though parents I know and parents of his friends stay with their children and grandchildren on visits).

— “Jane”

If you indeed “aren’t people who stay in hotels on short family visits,” then you aren’t people who will ever visit your son.

Done. Your choice.

For the record, I can think of about a dozen more helpful people not to be. You can not be people who:

— presume to tell your hosts how to host you. Because doing that is so incredibly rude — and, when you do it at a time you’re hoping to endear yourself to a child-in-law, it’s also self-defeating to a degree that leaves me agape.

— rummage around in a son’s other relationships for proof of how justified you are to feel wronged by him. “[T]hough parents I know and parents of his friends stay with their children and grandchildren on visits”?! Just, stop. You are not a child; take unwelcome news with some grace.

— expect grown children to follow your blueprint for what “family” does or doesn’t do. They’re old enough now to have their own vision of “family” — and you owe them and their choices the same respect you’d show any other adult (in those “other families” you “100% get”).

— shift blame onto the most vulnerable target. You say yourself that your son made the hotel request once before, pre-marriage. So quit the side-eye at the wife. Your son wants this. Period.

— refuse to be an agreeable or flexible guest, and then marvel when you’re invited only under certain terms and conditions.

Just for example.

I realize none of this is welcome advice for someone who is, at heart, just feeling hurt to be kept at arm’s length. (Right?) I also understand the underlying fear — that you’re losing your son to the new family he and his wife have created.

And you’re clearly aware you need to do your part, since you took pains to note your daughter-in-law’s good qualities and that you wait to be invited.

But anyone who really wants to solve the riddle of a strained relationship must reckon with this possibility, full on: “Maybe I have no one to blame but myself.” Even if you ultimately disprove it. Yet none of your finger-pointing is at you.

I urge you to look inward now because everything I’ve listed is an alienating behavior that you’ve employed — each one on its own an effective method at pushing people away. They all fit into a cycle of defensiveness, which no doubt this answer risks perpetuating, but which I also hope you override long enough to say to your son: “I’m sorry. I overstepped when I emailed you. I struggle with change, but I will adapt. I owe you and (wife) that.”

If overstepping has been your mothering brand, then a deeper reckoning is in order.

There are some objectively terrible people out there, many of whom become someone’s son- or daughter-in-law, of course — a sad and intractable problem. But you make it plain your son’s wife isn’t one of them. That means it’s on you to work with the people you’ve got, the arrangements they offer and opportunities you see. Open mind, open heart, open arms — and, yes, a room at a stinkin’ hotel.

Though I suggest treating yourself to a non-stinkin’ one, as your means permit.

Email Carolyn at [email protected], follow her on Facebook or chat with her online at noon each Friday at washingtonpost.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.