ShareThis Page
More Lifestyles

Husband's flight anxiety sentences family to long road trips

| Saturday, March 18, 2017, 9:00 p.m.

Hi, Carolyn:

My husband and I will be traveling to attend my mom's wedding. It's either a 13-hour drive (now that we have a child, it would probably actually eat up an entire day) or a 1 12-hour flight, plus brief transportation at each end. My husband hates to fly—mostly because he is frugal and dislikes being shuffled around by airlines, but also has slight confinement anxiety. He has a prescription for this when he absolutely has to fly, and it works well.

Meanwhile, I enjoy flying, don't mind paying for the convenience, and seriously do NOT want to sign on for a gruesome road trip with a toddler, who is pretty well-behaved on a plane.

This difference between us makes it hard to plan not only this trip, but also hypothetical future travel. I proposed that I fly with the toddler, which would give me more time to spend with family, and that he drive, if that's his preference. It infuriated him that I would consider “abandoning” him to drive alone. He seems to think the only answer is that we BOTH do the road trip thing, which I do not think makes sense.

What do we do in this case, and when this inevitably comes up again?

—Spouse

Why just deal with stubbornness and anxiety when you can have a boundary issue, too?

You have my sympathies. It's one thing to have a partner who is irrational on a particular issue—we all have our stuff, after all—but another for a “furious” partner to expect everyone to live in service of that irrationality.

You do have two advantages, though—time and distance. As in, this isn't a problem of culture or perception, like deciding whether gender roles are appropriate or how much one defers to Grandma. This hinges on how long it takes you to travel how far. Useful simplicity.

That means you can actually quantify what he's asking of you and draw the line where you think he's asking too much.

Let's say a drive is seven hours, where flying instead would involve 30 minutes to the airport, a 90-minute cushion for parking and security, a one-hour flight and another hour on the ground at your destination—so, four hours. Call it five to be generous and allow for delays and other hassles of air travel.

That means the cost of indulging your husband is two or three hours. Are you OK with that, yes or no? You decide for yourself, of course, but that doesn't sound too awful to me.

Now take the trip you're contemplating. The flight and ground transportation look to be about a four-hour commitment, compared with a 13-hour drive, which pegs your indulge-the-spouse cost at 9 hours. In a car with a toddler. Instead of with family.

Again—you decide what's right for you, but if I were doing that I'd want a prescription assist of my own.

So do the math, figure out what your pain limit is for extra driving, then explain it as such to your husband. Make it clear—you will gladly accommodate him up to X hours, and after that you hope he will accommodate you by either traveling separately as you suggest, or adopting your pain limit as his “absolutely has to fly” threshold.

You can't make him agree to this, of course. You can, however, stick to your own limit by not agreeing to gruesome car trips, even flying solo against his wishes if you must. While it isn't ideal, it's a valid response to accusations of “‘abandoning' him,” which are controlling and highly manipulative.

If that's his default, and not just a flight-anxiety-specific bit of emotional slumming, then make sure good marriage counseling comes next. Do that alone, too, if you must.

Dear Carolyn:

My husband and I are deciding whether to have kids. We live in an expensive city far away from any family. No one has visited us in the four years we've lived here.

I can't imagine raising kids with no support system; it scares me! My job is highly specialized so I don't really get to choose where I live, and we probably will never live anywhere near our families. How do I move past the fear of raising children without the village?

—Far Away

You remind yourself that you're human: What you don't have, you scrounge, improvise or make.

There's nothing that says you have to have kids, of course. It might just not be for you.

But if you want to be a parent, then do what countless others have done who, like you, have relocated for better opportunities—or who emigrated, or outlived their families, or cut ties after years of dysfunction. You discard preconceptions and develop a network of friends, paid caregivers, drop-in centers, schools and whatever else you need. You study your employers' leave policies. And you trust the resourcefulness that made you a specialized, big-city asset to serve you here, or in whatever challenge you take on next.

Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com, follow her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/carolyn.hax or chat with her online at noon Eastern time each Friday at www.washingtonpost.com

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me