ShareThis Page
More Lifestyles

Liberty or Lord Stanley? Help pick a name for new Pittsburgh police horse

Shirley McMarlin
| Monday, March 5, 2018, 4:24 p.m.
Lord Stanley is one of six draft horses in the Pittsburgh Police Bureau mounted patrol.
Lord Stanley is one of six draft horses in the Pittsburgh Police Bureau mounted patrol.

What's 17 hands high and weighs 1,700 pounds?

It's the City of Pittsburgh Bureau of Police's newest horse, and he needs a name.

Downtown Pittsburgh recently put out a call for suggestions and received more than 750 responses. Out of a field that included Steele, Shalieve, Steve and Horsy McHorseface, the monikers Clemente, Liberty, Lord Stanley and Officer Rogers were chosen as finalists.

Now you can pick your favorite through March 7 via #HorseWithNoNamePGH on Facebook or Twitter.

The winning name will be announced at Downtown Pittsburgh's annual meeting on March 14.

The person who suggested the winning name will have an opportunity to attend a meet-and-greet and photo opportunity with the horse, a 6-year-old Percheron/Tennessee Walking Horse cross that recently arrived at the mounted patrol's South Park stables from Glenfield, N.Y.

According to the Downtown Pittsburgh website, the organization was asked by the police bureau to suggest the name “due to the generosity of the Downtown business community in helping to re-establish the police department's mounted unit.”

And in case you're wondering, “17 hands” means the new equine officer measures 68 inches tall at the shoulder blades.

Shirley McMarlin is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-836-5750, or via Twitter @shirley_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me