ShareThis Page
More Lifestyles

Live-in boyfriend wanted a party, but not the burden of planning or hosting

| Saturday, Aug. 18, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

Adapted from a recent online discussion.

Dear Carolyn:

My boyfriend and I hosted a party, our first joint hosting stint since moving in together a few months ago. The party was his idea, and most of our guests were his close friends.

Yet he did almost nothing to help me get ready for the party. We split up the tasks beforehand, but he “ran out of time” to do his and I ended up having to rush through them at the end. Then halfway through the night he got tired and disappeared to the bedroom to play on his phone while I made sure everyone was still having a good time.

I’m really upset about all of this, as I feel that a few short months in, he’s already taking me for granted as a housemate and assuming I’m going to do the “women’s work” of hosting. If he were to ask me to redo that party next year, I would definitely say no — there was nothing in it for me, just work and expenses.

I’m still too angry to talk to him about it, but whenever I do, what’s the right message to send here?

— Hangover

“Are you going to do your half, or am I going to pack my half? Because this never happens again.”

Yes, that’s an ultimatum, which I always advise never to resort to, along with never using “never” or “always.”

Why here? Because it’s so clear cut: If he gets it, truly gets it, then this will have been the most useful crappy party of your life. If he doesn’t get it — truly get it — then do indeed pack up.

No one is worth a sacrifice that you find demoralizing and offensive.

By the way, you’ve already subtly consented to this sacrifice by referring to “next year.” There is no next week unless and until you’re confident there’s no “next”: No next dumping of all the work on you, no next assuming you’ll just do it, no next reduction of you to a role. Internalize this. Beyond parties and into everything.

There is of course the possibility your boyfriend just got himself out of his depth. Maybe he lacks both the practical time-budgeting skills necessary to accomplish his half of a to-do list on a deadline, and the social skills to stay “on” as a host for hours on end.

These shortfalls (and shortcomings) warrant sympathy for sure. But true maturity would have been to make sure these stayed his problem; instead he made them yours when he opted to run and hide instead of admitting he’d overreached.

To make them your problem — without any awareness, apparently, that he was dumping extra work on you or taking you for granted — was to betray his comfort with letting you carry the load.

Had he gotten up the next day and apologized for not following through with his own big idea, and admitted that he got in over his head, then I expect we wouldn’t be having this little chat. He didn’t, so we are, so you need to. Good luck.

Email Carolyn at, follow her on Facebook at or chat with her online at noon Eastern time each Friday at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me