ShareThis Page
More Lifestyles

Husband won't commit to a business venture, allows wife to carry financial burden

| Monday, Oct. 8, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

Adapted from a recent online discussion.

Dear Carolyn:

“Ken” and I have been married five years, together nine. Ken is an amazing person; he’s upbeat, handsome, charming, and thoughtful, but can’t seem to stick to a job. He has a master’s in a high-paying technical field that cost his parents a fortune, but he hated it so much he lasted less than a year in that field. Since we’ve been together, he has participated in seven different business ventures.

He gets super enthusiastic about a “new” thing, spends a lot of time and money doing the fun and exciting part, but loses interest when the tough, mundane reality of running a business hits. I’ve had to work lots of overtime just to keep us solvent, we can never save, and can’t even think about having children.

When I talk to him about finding something steady, he tells me he’s still looking for his passion but when he finds it, things will take off faster than I can imagine.

I guess I could accept the status quo and love Ken for who he is, or admit love isn’t enough and divorce him. Since I do love him, but want a stable life, I’m looking for advice that finds a middle ground.

— Overtime

My little voice was screaming “ADHD! ADHD!” but neither I nor my little voice is credentialed, so consult a professional if you think there’s something to this.

Otherwise, there’s no middle ground without buy-in from Ken.

And there’s no magic fix for someone a-OK with watching a spouse work “lots of overtime” just to keep things afloat despite his having no plan of his own. You’re not carrying the weight while he, say, grinds through law school or works a thoroughly investigated business plan or pursues one concentrated shot at making a creative vocation pay. You didn’t volunteer to be sole breadwinner. You’re working while he plays.

Did you get to look for your passion, by the way? Does your work already fit that description?

So, yeah. You either decide he’s a househusband and see whether there’s a happily-ever-after in that, and if there is, then you restructure your lives to fit into one income — certainly partners are more than their paychecks, or else what happens when one can’t work, is home with kids, or is just really great at and satisfied by running a home? Or you say no, this is not an arrangement you can abide, because the resentment it generates — from the physical fatigue of extra work to the mental fatigue of being broke to the chafe of his draining you to indulge himself — outweighs the good.

Re: Ken:

Yes, it could be ADHD, but you are now your husband’s mother. It’s a miserable, miserable way to live. Please, don’t go 20 years with him before reaching your breaking point like I did. You can’t have children with someone who can’t carry their share of the load.

— Been There

Re: Ken:

We do folks such a disservice by propagating the myth that their vocation must be a passion to be rewarding and worthwhile. Maybe your vocation funds your passion. Or, maybe there is great satisfaction in excelling at a job, providing for your family and not burdening your partner.

— Anonymous

Amen to both, thanks.

Email Carolyn at tellme@washpost.com, follow her on Facebook at www.facebook.com/carolyn.hax or chat with her online at noon Eastern time each Friday at www.washingtonpost.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me