ShareThis Page
More Lifestyles

Beau can address matter with his mother

| Sunday, July 28, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

Adapted from a recent online discussion.

Dear Carolyn:

My boyfriend's mother has started introducing me to her friends as her “daughter-in-law.” There's a long history of her discomfort with the fact that her son and I aren't married (yet/ever?), and I'm not sure how to address this new wrinkle.

Should I leave it alone, since it's relatively harmless and probably makes her feel better in her social circle, or correct the inaccurate label?

— Maryland

What has your boyfriend thought or done about it? This is his move before it's yours. I hope he greets it with a pull-aside and a discreet, “Mom, please cut the (crud). Thank you.”

If she's doing it when he's not around to hear it, then I suggest speaking up to her afterward, in private. “I appreciate how welcoming you are, but calling me your daughter-in-law leaves me with two awkward choices: to correct you or to deceive others. I hope you'll understand that I'd rather not do either one.”

Obviously, I disagree that her using this term is “relatively harmless.” What she's doing is manipulative and wrong — forcing her views, really, under a veil of propriety, family and apple pie.

Re: Non-daughter-in-law:

Is it manipulative to use a formal term for an informal relationship? I used to refer to my (now, really, truly) stepmother as such when she and my dad were cohabiting. It was mostly for simplicity's sake but also to introduce her in relation to me, and there was no other good term for it. Dad could call her any number of things, but all I had was “Dad's live-in girlfriend,” which felt impersonal, or “stepmom.”

— Anonymous

Remember, we're talking about a situation where “there's a long history of her discomfort” — hence my reading it as manipulative.

To answer your general question: Whenever you're not sure, ask. “I don't like to call you X because it feels Y. OK if I call you Z?

It can also be helpful to err on the side of omission. Of the three pieces of information — “Dad's,” “live-in,” “girlfriend” — how many did your listener really need?

Dear Carolyn:

I've been out with a guy a few times. We seemed to have really awesome chemistry (I know, I know, everyone always thinks that), but he canceled our last two dates, citing what seemed to be very legit reasons. He also said he wouldn't be able to get together for the rest of the month because he was behind on work, but that he was looking forward to seeing me next month.

Now it's next month and I have heard nothing. So: Do I text and ask what's up and risk seeming too eager? Or do I let it go and assume he is not that into me?

— To Text or Not to Text

I can argue both sides with conviction.

In favor of getting in touch: Who cares if he thinks you're too eager? You just want to know what's up, and if he thinks that makes you his groupie, then that's his problem.

In favor of not getting touch: You already know as much as you need to know.

Email Carolyn Hax at tellme@washpost.com, or chat with her online at noon Eastern time each Friday at www.washingtonpost.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me