ShareThis Page
More Lifestyles

The Word Guy: Avoid current cliches such as 'moving parts'

| Friday, Oct. 31, 2014, 8:57 p.m.

“Campaigns are complex organisms with hundreds of moving parts.”

When I encountered that sentence recently, I was willing to overlook the mixed metaphor that mingled the organic and the mechanical. But I couldn't ignore the ubiquitous cliche “moving parts.”

As you've probably noticed, our business jargon now features more “moving parts” than a Rube Goldberg machine, e.g., “This merger has a lot of moving parts.”

Such verbal contraptions, like dangerous toys, should be labeled: “This sentence contains ‘moving parts' — not suitable for children under 99.”

Some other current cliches:

Get it right. The sport of football has many moving parts, but the favorite cliche of chagrined NFL officials during these scandal-ridden weeks has been some version of “getting this right.”

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell vowed “to get it right,” while Carolina Panthers General Manager Dave Gettleman pledged, “We have to get this right.”

Dallas Cowboys Vice President Stephen Jones proclaimed a virtual Bill of Rights: “We haven't got it right, and we have been rightfully criticized for not getting it right. I think we will ultimately get it right. There is a lot of work to get done on how you get that right.” Right.

Monetize. These days, you can “monetize” just about anything. In recent weeks, I've read articles on how to monetize your cat (make Fluffy famous on YouTube), your closet (sell that old bridesmaid's dress) and your jack-o'-lantern. (OK, I made up that last one.)

Until the past few years, “monetize,” which first appeared in English during the 1870s, has had only two narrow definitions: to coin or print money, or to convert government debt from securities into cash. But “monetize” now refers to the turning of any resource or asset into cash — perhaps by finding an “elegant solution.”

Elegant solution. In mathematics and engineering, an “elegant solution” is a means of solving a problem with the least possible waste of materials and effort. Think very few moving parts, like a paper clip.

But now The New York Times is describing every idea or gadget as “an elegant solution,” including the use of a New York City alleyway as an emergency exit, technical innovations in a sewage treatment plant and a new app that allows your cellphone to download your restaurant bill and pay it — presumably very useful in “elegant” restaurants.

Rob Kyff is a teacher in West Hartford, Conn. Send reports of misuse and abuse, as well as examples of good writing, to Wordguy@aol.com or to Rob Kyff, Creators Syndicate, 737 Third St., Hermosa Beach, CA 90254.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me