From flags to feathers, space waste will greet next moon walkers | TribLIVE.com
Travel

From flags to feathers, space waste will greet next moon walkers

1386286_web1_gtr-trv-moontrash2-071419
AP
When the Apollo 11 crew splashed down in the Pacific Ocean on July 24, 1969, after their historic moon landing, they had left an American flag — along with some unsightly trash — behind on the lunar surface. Shown are U.S. Navy personnel, protected by Biological Isolation Garments, recovering the crew from the re-entry vehicle.
1386286_web1_gtr-trv-moontrash-071419
NASA/AP
Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong and Edwin E. “Buzz” Aldrin, the first men to land on the moon, plant the U.S. flag on the lunar surface, July 20, 1969. Photo was made by a 16mm movie camera inside the lunar module, shooting at one frame per second.

The mission on the moon then over, astronaut Buzz Aldrin peeked out from the Apollo lunar module onto the powdery grey surface before him, the U.S. flag planted into it — just about the only color as far as the eye could see.

But as the ascent engines on the spacecraft came to life, carrying him and Neil Armstrong up, up, up, Aldrin caught a glimpse of something.

Did the exhaust blow the $5.50 flag from its lunar foothold? Maybe. Probably.

Images taken by NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera more than 40 years later proved Aldrin right. Unlike the other Apollo sites, there is no longer an American flag standing at the place where humankind first made contact with the lunar surface now 50 years ago on July 20.

When people do return to our celestial partner, they likely won’t find standing the most famous item that was left behind — a symbol of the nation’s sacrifice and accomplishment. But they’ll find other things: Lunar landers and moon cars, camera gear and backpacks, a photo, maybe a few faded flags, some golf balls if they’re lucky.

They’ll find some more recent occupants too, including an Israeli lander called Beresheet that crashed onto the surface in April.

Lunar junkyard

But the Apollo missions were responsible for leaving the largest chunk of the estimated 400,000 pounds of detritus left behind on the moon, a graveyard of spacecraft parts and symbolic items that was never supposed to be left undisturbed for so long.

If current schedules hold, astronauts may stumble upon the remains as soon as 2024. Here is what they may find:

Ninety-six bags of poop — and other human waste.

When it came to defecating on or en route to the moon, astronauts had to rely on a pretty simple process: a bag taped to their bottoms. If all went well — that is, if the feces all ended up in the bag and not floating in the Apollo craft as sometimes happened — the waste would then be left on the moon as one of the many things discarded on the lunar surface to reduce the weight inside the spacecraft when it headed back to Earth.

The six Apollo missions that landed on the moon produced 96 bags of waste. According to the NASA History Office, white jettison bags, or trash bags, are definitely still on the moon, some containing astronaut poop.

Aldrin tweeted about it in April, saying, “Well, I sure feel bad for whoever finds my bag.”

In rough shape

Five decades of exposure to ultraviolet radiation and 500-degree temperature swings probably haven’t been quite the nurturing environment needed to keep the five flags that remain on the moon in tip-top shape.

Apart from the Apollo 11 flag, which is believed to have been lost, the others were planted during Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17. According to images captured by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter during different times of day, shadows in the areas where the flags were planted indicate they’re still standing.

Still, they’re not likely to look like the well-known images of crisp red, white and blue flags stark against the bottomless black of space.

“You know how (if) you leave a flag out over summer, how it starts to fade,” Arizona State University scientist Mark Robinson, the principal investigator of LRO’s camera, told space.com in 2011. “Now, imagine the extreme UV environment on the moon, and the hot and cold cycling … they’re probably in pretty rough shape.”

Gravity experiment

In the final minutes of the Apollo 15 moon walk, Commander David Scott performed a small science experiment for the live television viewers back on his home planet. He dropped a 0.06-pound falcon feather and a nearly 3-pound aluminum hammer from the same height at the same time.

In the vacuum of space, they both hit the lunar surface simultaneously, confirming astronomer Galileo Galilei’s theory that mass, or the weight of an object, doesn’t have any effect on gravitational pull. The objects should fall at the same rate.

Because of the atmosphere on Earth, it doesn’t quite work that way — but it does on the moon.

“How about that,” Scott said when they hit the ground. “Mr. Galileo was correct in his findings.”

The feather and hammer, it seems, are still there.

Family photo

Charles Duke was only 36 years old when he stepped on the moon during Apollo 16, the youngest man to do so. He was married to Dorothy Meade Claiborne and had two sons — Charles Duke III, who was 7 at the time, and Thomas Duke, 5 — but was spending long periods of time away from his family in Houston while training in Florida.

“So just to get the kids excited about what dad was going to do, I said ‘Would y’all like to go to the moon with me?’ ” Duke told Business Insider in 2015. “We can take a picture of the family and so the whole family can go to the moon.”

A friend from NASA, Ludy Benjamin, took a photo of the Dukes in their backyard and on the back the astronaut wrote: “This is the family of Astronaut Duke from Planet Earth. Landed on the moon, April 1972.” The kids signed it, too.

Duke shrink-wrapped the photo and fulfilled the promise.

“So I left that on the Moon and took a picture of the picture,” he told NASA in his 1999 oral history, “and that’s one of our neatest possessions now.”

Tee time

Armstrong had the first step. Aldrin had the first tinkle. Alan Shepard had the first swing.

The astronaut and avid golfer told NASA in his 1998 oral history that he was intrigued by the idea that a ball hit by the same club head could travel “six times as far” in the airless environment on the moon.

But to convince NASA to let him do it, Shepard modified the handle used to scoop lunar samples and affixed an adapted club head to it. He took two golf balls with him, all of which he paid for.

Shepard promised his boss, Bob Gilruth, the director of NASA’s Manned Spacecraft Center, that he would wait to take the golf swing at the end of the Apollo 14 mission and only proceed if everything else had gone well.

So on Feb. 6, 1971, Shepard teed up his golf balls. Because of the bulkiness of his suit, he could only grab the club with his right hand. He shot. The first ball fell into a nearby crater but the second attempt was more successful.

“Miles and miles and miles!” Shepard called out as it soared away. The two are still there.

For years later, Shepard refused to say what brand the balls were, lest some company try to profit from the information.

“One company tried to say it was their golf ball, and we cut them off very quickly,” Shepard told NASA. The astronaut sued a manufacturer who claimed to have made the moon balls.

“I’ve never told anybody. I’ve never told my wife,” he is quoted as saying in his biography, “Light This Candle: The Life and Times of Alan Shepard.”

But, as the biography’s author, Neal Thompson, revealed: The balls were in fact made by Spalding.

Categories: Lifestyles | Travel
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.