ShareThis Page
How long is the airport security wait? These apps will tell you | TribLIVE.com
Travel

How long is the airport security wait? These apps will tell you

702822_web1_travel-apps-e0a5ccf6-263b-11e9-90cd-dedb0c92dc17
App in the Air
App in the Air can help travelers predict wait times for TSA security lines.

Airport security lines can behave like curly hair: One small change in the atmosphere and everything can go out of whack. Weather, holidays and most recently the partial government shutdown have turned a routine procedure into a panicky production.

The Transportation Security Administration and airlines advise domestic passengers to arrive at the airport at least 90 minutes before their departure time, or even earlier during peak or atypical travel periods. Toward the end of the 35-day governmental crisis, some airports were reporting above-average wait times, such as Atlanta’s Hartsfield- Jackson International Airport (42 minutes) and Baltimore-Washington International Marshall Airport (37 minutes).

Over the years, several companies and one federal agency have introduced apps that provide travelers with average security line wait times. The numbers are crowdsourced by other passengers or are based on historical data — or are a mix of both. With another possible shutdown looming (the stopgap bill expires Feb. 15) and spring break on the horizon, we decided to test the timekeepers at three airports.

The apps

In my initial online research, I discovered six apps that promised to deliver security line wait times. However, upon deeper investigation, three were operating, two appeared to have gone out of business and one (Kayak) dropped the feature.

MiFlight was as simple and straightforward as a Casio watch that has one job to do: relay the time. Type in the airport and select the terminal, and the wait time will pop up in large-print digits. Bonus eye candy: an attractive backdrop photo of the destination, such as the U.S. Capitol for Reagan National Airport, a beach sunset for Miami and a Mardi Gras reveler for New Orleans.

MyTSA, which is run by the agency, lists the archival wait times for every day of the week, plus one-hour increments from midnight to midnight. It also offers a handy histogram for procrastinators who are trying to reform their race-to-the-gate habit. The app also posts submissions from passengers at the airport. To stay relevant and accurate, the app will retain the times for only two hours.

App in the Air wants to be “your personal travel assistant,” a helpful tool if you need someone (or thing) to organize your travel schedule but a bit intrusive if you just want time-management guidance. After allowing the app to access my reservations, I had to click on my flight and departure airport to see the wait times for check-in, passport and security. To peruse an airport out of sheer curiosity, I had to plug in a pretend flight.

The findings

A few hours before my early- evening departure recently , I checked all three apps. The times for Reagan National were “less than 15 minutes” (MyTSA), “30 mins” (MiFlight) and “10 minutes” (App in the Air). Unfortunately, I had to disqualify the last entry because “10 minutes” was App in the Air’s default mode. In an email, co-founder Nikita Kosholkin explained: “The 10 min mark is set by default when we don’t have enough data for the particular line. The data you see is currently an average for the airport (hence, there is no timestamp), but we do have plans to show wait times linked with your departure time in future updates.” (I later noodled around with other airports and discovered some useful results, such as a 23-minute wait at Dulles International Airport and 19 minutes at New York’s JFK.)

At the airport, I opened the apps again. On MyTSA, one traveler had reported a wait of “one to 10 minutes.” MiFlight had dropped down to 10 minutes. For this exercise, I joined the regular line instead of PreCheck. (MyTSA provides estimates for the trusted traveler queue; the others don’t.) I started the stopwatch right after showing my boarding pass to the official at the entrance of the line and stopped it after collecting my bags on the other side. Total time: 12 minutes 15 seconds, not counting the bag check triggered by my container of mango. Before heading to my gate, I tried to report my wait time, but unfortunately I could not find the option on the screen. (Sharing is much easier on MiFlight. Scroll down for the timer, then press “Share Time.”)

For additional testing, I roped in two other travelers, loaned to us by a colleague. Her husband was flying out of BWI on a Friday morning, the day the government ended the shutdown. The apps reported “standard wait times are typically 15-30 min” (MyTSA), “30 minutes” (MiFlight) and “10 minutes” (App in the Air). The actual wait time was 13 minutes. Her daughter departed from Cleveland Hopkins International Airport on Sunday afternoon. The apps posted less than 15 minutes, 30 minutes and 10 minutes, respectively. She whizzed through security in 12 minutes.

The lesson

Based on our sampling, MyTSA was the most accurate, especially when the times came from real-time travelers. The other apps could be useful if they were more transparent with their sources of information. In this era of busier skies, stronger storms and record-breaking shutdowns, stopwatches-on-the-ground are a better time gauge than historical data. So, passengers, help out your fellow travelers: Start your clocks and send in those minutes.


Andrea Sachs is a writer
for The Washington Post.


Categories: Lifestyles | Travel
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.