ShareThis Page
Allegheny

Jail inmate activist disrupts Martin Luther King Jr. Day event

Natasha Lindstrom
| Monday, Jan. 16, 2017, 4:51 p.m.

A protester interrupted Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald's remarks Monday afternoon during a Martin Luther King Jr. event at the August Wilson Center for African American Culture in Downtown Pittsburgh.

"People are dying!" Teonna Ross, 27, a Morningside resident and activist in the inmate advocacy group Allegheny County Jail Health Justice Project, shouted at Fitzgerald while he was speaking on a stage while flanked by Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto.

"We are dying of not getting proper medication, we're dying of seizures ... in Allegheny County Jail," Ross called out, disrupting for a few minutes the celebration attended by dozens of community members and dignitaries.

The event included spoken and sung performances and brief presentations by public officials and community leaders centered on finding ways to cultivate a more "welcoming" Pittsburgh — ensuring that low-income, immigrant and minority residents share in the region's economic growth.

"We're going to continue to work together as a community and welcome all people, and let me just say this," said Fitzgerald, looking toward Ross as she continued to shout. "Our jail population is the lowest it's been since the jail was opened."

Ross retorted, "Fire the warden!"

Security officials escorted Ross out of the building without further incident.

Peduto then took the podium.

"One of the things that we learned through the civil rights movement is there is a need to be able to speak up, like we just heard ... in order to be able make sure that all voices are heard," Peduto said.

Allegheny County spokeswoman Amie Downs declined to comment on the incident.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at nlindstrom@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me