ShareThis Page

West Mifflin residents could get assist in fight for bus service

| Friday, March 3, 2017, 5:36 p.m.
Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review

An effort by residents of a West Mifflin housing complex to reinstate bus service there could be getting a boost from elected officials.

Allegheny County Council on Tuesday will consider a motion to formally urge Port Authority to reinstate bus service to Mifflin Estates. The service was discontinued in 2009.

A group of Mifflin Estates residents have been going to Port Authority and County Council meetings for the past several months to urge officials to reinstate the route.

Councilman Bob Macey, D-West Mifflin, sponsored the resolution.

The Section 8 housing complex has 201 units. Residents, many of whom are seniors and single parents, must walk a mile and a half along hilly, nonlit roads or get expensive taxis to get to the nearest bus stop, the resolution says. It's unclear whether it will have an effect.

The service request by Mifflin Estates residents will be ranked by Port Authority staff, along with dozens of others it has received, as part of an annual service examination, Port Authority spokesman Jim Ritchie said.Service requests are ranked based on various factors, but public comments and resolutions by elected officials are not among them.

The Port Authority board votes in the spring, as part of the budget process, to approve service improvements recommended by staff, Ritchie said.

Last year, three projects were chosen for funding. The West Mifflin project was near the middle of the list in the rankings.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me