ShareThis Page

Board cites prescriptions for girlfriend in suspending Pittsburgh doctor

| Tuesday, Aug. 1, 2017, 5:33 p.m.
AP Photo
AP Photo

The State Board of Medicine has suspended a Pittsburgh doctor's medical license because, the board said, he prescribed drugs to his girlfriend and her daughter without keeping medical records about the treatment.

Daljit Singh, an internist with an office in Bloomfield, worked as a consultant who referred patients to Health South Rehabilitation Hospital in Harmarville. He entered into a relationship with a nurse who was working there about 2008, according to a state consent agreement and order filed Thursday.

During the relationship, which lasted until 2012, Singh prescribed his girlfriend antidepressants, antivirals, antibiotics, Adderall, amphetamine, hydrocodone and alprazolam, the agreement said.

Singh also wrote Adderall prescriptions for his girlfriend's daughter, who was a minor at the time. He failed to maintain medical records for the treatment for either patient, the agreement said.

A request for comment left at Singh's office was not immediately returned.

State law says physicians must keep complete and accurate medical records on the evaluation and treatment of patients.

Singh bought his girlfriend a house and gave her $20,000 for “educational purposes,” the agreement states.

The board ordered Singh to pay $10,183 in investigation costs, and to complete two three-day classes at Vanderbilt University on maintaining proper boundaries and prescribing controlled drugs, the agreement said.

After the classes, which end in mid-September, Singh can petition the board to reinstate his license, the agreement said.

Singh is listed on a UPMC website as being affiliated with several UPMC hospitals. A UPMC spokeswoman did not return a request seeking comment.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669, or via Twitter @tclift.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me