ShareThis Page

Washington County man pleads 'no contest' to failing to deliver on $400K in car work

Megan Guza
| Tuesday, Sept. 26, 2017, 11:30 a.m.

A Washington County man pleaded no contest Tuesday to bilking hundreds of thousands of dollars from customers who turned to him for restoration work on their classic cars, according to the Allegheny County District Attorney's Office.

Curtis Ukasik, 44, of Finleyville pleaded no contest to 19 counts of theft and one count of deceptive business practices, court records show. He owned Redline Performance Motorsports, which operated out of garages in Warrendale, Corapolis, Zelienople and Harmony.

Ukasik was charged in April 2016 for allegedly taking customers' money and feeding them excuses for months when the work never materialized.

Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Randal Todd set a sentencing date of Dec. 18. The DA's office said it will seek restitution of more than $400,000.

According to the criminal complaint, Ukasik took customers' money and then made excuses for months about why they had not received their restored cars.

In one instance, Ukasik told a customer that a rebuild of his 1949 Ford would take six months. Four years and more than $170,000 later, Ukasik still had not provided a completed car, according to the complaint.

The alleged victim said Ukasik repeatedly made excuses for the continued delay, including “the body shop guy was slow, the upholstery guy was not available, and ... employees were not showing up,” according to the complaint.

In another instance, a woman from Beaver County gave Ukasik the hot rod body of a 1932 Ford Deuce worth $10,000 to sell on consignment, according to the complaint. Ukasik gave the car body away to a customer in place of money he owed the customer. When the woman asked, he said he'd sold the car body for $11,000.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me