ShareThis Page

One-of-a-kind Honus Wagner card now up for auction

Brian C. Rittmeyer
| Thursday, Nov. 2, 2017, 11:09 p.m.
The only known example of the Honus Wagner 'Silk Sox' card, which is currently up for auction.
SCP Auctions
The only known example of the Honus Wagner 'Silk Sox' card, which is currently up for auction.

A Honus Wagner card 75 times rarer than the 1910 tobacco card that sold for $3.1 million a year ago is up for auction, according to a report by Forbes .

Despite being a one-of-a-kind, the price was said to be only about $3,200 — including the buyer's premium — with just three bids, and the auction closes on Saturday.

According to the Forbes report, the 1917 "Silk Sox" advertising card was issued in the middle of the 43-year-old veteran's final season. The image is of Wagner in full uniform, wearing a team sweater while warming up.

Wagner, the Pittsburgh Pirates' all-time great, took the field with his Pittsburgh team on Aug. 26, 1917 for an exhibition game against the Silk Sox, a semi-pro team from New Jersey.

The card first appeared in a Christie's Auction in 1992, the Forbes report says. It sold for $500.

The card is ungraded. It's 4-by-7 inches, an unusual size, so it can't be put in a standard holder.

The card appears old and worn, with minor soiling, some line abrasions and light creasing, according to the description from SCP Auctions. Its back is blank.

Then Silk Sox card is expected to fetch from $4,000 to $6,000.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4701, or via Twitter @BCRittmeyer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me