ShareThis Page
Allegheny

U.S. Steel's Edgar Thompson plant accused of excessive emissions

Theresa Clift
| Tuesday, Nov. 14, 2017, 1:42 p.m.
The sun rises over the Monongahela Valley as smoke slowly rises from U.S. Steel's Edgar Thompson Works in Braddock on Sunday, Nov. 10, 2013.
Tribune-Review
The sun rises over the Monongahela Valley as smoke slowly rises from U.S. Steel's Edgar Thompson Works in Braddock on Sunday, Nov. 10, 2013.

The Environmental Protection Agency and Allegheny County Health Department have issued a notice of violation for air pollution at U.S. Steel's Edgar Thompson plant in Braddock in what could mark the start of stricter enforcement at such facilities.

Both agencies said they observed multiple violations of both county and federal rules beginning in February 2016 and continuing into 2017, according to a county news release.

Excessive visible emissions, failure to maintain equipment and failure to certify compliance with the plant's Title V operating permit are among the violations.

“This notice of violation represents a strategic change in ACHD's enforcement efforts by utilizing all of our legal options, which in this case is a joint action with EPA,” Dr. Karen Hacker, health department director, said in the release. “With EPA on board, our enforcement power is exponentially increased.”

The notice begins the process of determining the penalties and equipment improvements that will be required to return the plant to compliance, the release said.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669, tclift@tribweb.com or via Twitter @tclift.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me