ShareThis Page
Allegheny

Musicians and artist host underground arts festival in old limestone mine

Andrew Russell
| Sunday, Dec. 3, 2017, 5:21 p.m.

On Saturday night, 108 Carnegie Mellon University students and faculty plus performance art fans traveled an hour and 15 minutes from the CMU campus in Oakland to experience the region's first underground arts festival.

The event was dubbed SubSurface. A team of CMU students and faculty created works designed to be presented within the confines of Brady's Bend Underground Storage, an old limestone mine owned by CMU alumnus Daniel Bruce located in Bradys Bend, Armstrong County.

The project was conceived and executed by Richard Pell, an associate professor at CMU's School of Art, and Jesse Stiles, a faculty member with the School of Music at the university.

“It kind of became clear that there was an opportunity to do an event there, because they were so receptive and inviting,” Stiles said. “So we arrived at this idea of creating an evening of art and music that we could present in this really unique and unusual underground space.”

Audience members were transported to Bradys Bend via shuttle bus, and dropped off deep inside the mine.

After that, with glow sticks in hand, they began a tour that spanned a half mile through the mine with visual and performance pieces lighting the way.

The event culminated with a performance by a group that Stiles describes as CMU's experimental music wing called Exploded Ensemble.

Andrew Russell is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at arussell@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me