ShareThis Page
Allegheny

Pittsburgh's FOP president accuses city of discrimination in labor complaint

Bob Bauder
| Friday, Jan. 12, 2018, 1:39 p.m.
Robert Swartzwelder, Fraternal Order of Police president, controls the traffic signals at the intersection of Fulton and Western following the Pirates game on Friday, August 5, 2016.
Guy Wathen | Tribune-Review
Robert Swartzwelder, Fraternal Order of Police president, controls the traffic signals at the intersection of Fulton and Western following the Pirates game on Friday, August 5, 2016.

The president of Pittsburgh's police union alleges the city violated state law and his rights as a union official by disciplining him over an email he sent to members in May criticizing the federal prosecution and trial of an officer convicted of police brutality.

Robert Swartzwelder, president of Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge 1, filed a complaint with the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board accusing police officials of “unlawful discrimination” and “anti-union animus.”

“In a city that is largely Democratic and supposedly pro-union, the complaint clearly demonstrates that they're anti-union, primarily anti-police union,” Swartzwelder said.

Public Safety Director Wendell Hissrich declined comment, saying he was prohibited from discussing personnel disciplinary matters.

Police bureau officials ordered Swartzwelder to attend a counseling session after he issued an email highly critical of the U.S. Attorney's office and West End-based Landmark Event Services over the prosecution of former Pittsburgh police Sgt. Stephen Matakovich. The session amounts to a verbal reprimand.

The U.S. Attorney's Office and Landmark, which provides private security at Heinz Field, declined comment.

Matakovich is serving 27 months in federal prison for assaulting Gabriel Despres of South Park, who was drunk at a high school championship football game at Heinz Field on Nov. 28, 2015. A Federal Bureau of Prisons database lists him as an inmate at a low-security prison in Butner, N.C.

Video of the incident shows Matakovich pushing Despres, then 19, and repeatedly slapping him in the head. Despres pleaded guilty to trespassing and public drunkenness in connection with the incident.

In the email, Swartzwelder said Matakovich was unfairly prosecuted and advised FOP members to avoid working off-duty details at Heinz Field. Matakovich was working off-duty during the football game when summoned by Landmark to eject Despres.

“Landmark security made up facts and changed several perspectives to serve in my opinion an unscrupulous U.S. Attorney's Office prosecution,” Swartzwelder wrote. “As for working in and around Landmark Security, any officer who does this jeopardizes their safety, livelihood, pension and freedom.”

Police officials said Swartzwelder's words amounted to conduct unbecoming an officer, according to the labor complaint.

Swartzwelder and FOP attorneys contend that a union official's private communication to members is protected under state law.

“The written counseling action by the city constitutes unlawful discrimination against Swartzwelder based upon anti-union animus,” the complaint says. “The city sought to punish Swartzwelder for speaking out as the president of the FOP.”

The Labor Relations Board has scheduled a telephone conference for February 13 and a hearing for April 23 if the sides fail to settle the complaint in February.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312, bbauder@tribweb.com or on Twitter @bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me