ShareThis Page
Allegheny

Amazon requests silence in HQ2 search, according to leaked details

Aaron Aupperlee
| Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2018, 5:18 p.m.
This file photo taken on Dec. 11, 2014, shows the logo of the online retailer Amazon displayed on computer screens in London.
AFP/Getty Images
This file photo taken on Dec. 11, 2014, shows the logo of the online retailer Amazon displayed on computer screens in London.

Amazon wants the next phase of its search for a second headquarters to proceed in secret, without updates to the public, the company told one of the 20 finalists on a conference call.

Despite a plea for silence, details about what might be next for Pittsburgh and the other top cities leaked out of the call Monday between Amazon and official working on Newark's bid, according to ROI, a New Jersey business news website .

The story quotes a person familiar with what was said during the conference who requested anonymity.

“They gave the indication that they wanted the public discourse to stop,” the anonymous source was quoted as saying.

Amie Downs, spokeswoman for Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald, a member of Pittsburgh's team working on the Amazon bid, wouldn't say whether there has been a call with Pittsburgh officials and said that the team would not share any information about communications it has with Amazon.

PGHQ2, the team working on the bid, has refused to release the bid or any details about it. Public record requests under Pennsylvania's Right to Know Law have been denied. Pennsylvania Community & Economic Development Secretary Dennis Davin told PennLive last week the incentive package offered by the state may be among the largest ever .

Amazon on Thursday announced the top 20 cities or regions still in the running for its second headquarters. Pittsburgh and Philadelphia made the list . As many as 50,000 high-paying jobs and $5 billion in investment are at stake.

According to the Newark source, Amazon will send the 20 finalists a second, more specific request for proposals by the end of the week. This document will not be public. Amazon's initial RFP was posted here .

Amazon officials also said they will visit each of the 20 finalists, and the visit will not be public, the source told ROI.

This story has been updated to more accurately reflect comments Department of Community and Economic Development Director Dennis Davin made to PennLive.

Aaron Aupperlee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at aaupperlee@tribweb.com, 412-336-8448 or via Twitter @tinynotebook.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me