ShareThis Page
Allegheny

Rankin man pleads guilty to robbing, shooting jitney driver

| Monday, Jan. 29, 2018, 3:57 p.m.
Bernard Carter, left, and Dahrayl Smith
Bernard Carter, left, and Dahrayl Smith

One of two men accused of critically wounding a jitney driver in an attempted robbery in North Braddock will serve five to 15 years in prison after he pleaded guilty to robbery and attempted homicide charges Monday, officials said.

Police and prosecutors said Bernard Carter, 26, of Rankin, was one of two men who took a ride with jitney driver Cecil Mobley from Rivers Casino, where he and Dahrayl Smith had just gotten into an argument and pointed a gun at two other men in the early morning of Feb. 25, 2017.

According to a criminal complaint, Carter and Smith directed Mobley down a dead-end street in North Braddock and demanded his money, shooting him multiple times as he brought his vehicle to a stop and fled. Police found him in a Dunbar Street yard , his empty GMC Acadia parked nearby.

Security camera footage from the casino led police to Smith and Carter, though Smith initially denied that he and Carter had shot Mobley.

Carter pleaded guilty Monday before Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas Judge Randal Todd to attempted homicide, robbery, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment and conspiracy; Todd sentenced him to two concurrent sentences of five to 15 years in prison.

Smith is still awaiting trial on the same charges. He is currently scheduled for a jury trial in April.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me