ShareThis Page
Allegheny

U.S. Marshals seek Allegheny County fugitive who took part in child sex ring

Tom Fontaine
| Thursday, Feb. 8, 2018, 2:27 p.m.

U.S. Marshals are searching for an Allegheny County man who failed to report to federal prison to begin serving a sentence for his role in a child sex trafficking ring.

Daniel Teed, 56, of Marshall, was sentenced in October to 10 years in prison for conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of children. Authorities said he had sex with a 16-year-old girl at parties arranged by a former girls basketball coach between June 2015 and June 2016.

Authorities issued a warrant for Teed after he failed to report to a federal prison near Johnstown in early January, according to Deputy U.S. Marshal Tad Thompson.

“We are actively hunting him now,” Thompson said.

Thompson said investigators received information that Teed “had access to firearms prior to fleeing. We do have reason to believe that he is armed and dangerous.”

Teed is described as standing 5 feet 8 inches tall and weighing 200 pounds. He has blue eyes and partially gray hair. He is a Crawford County native who previously lived near Orlando, Fla., and traveled around the United States for business. He also had a history of traveling internationally, Thompson said.

The former girls basketball coach — Ralph Ruprecht, 51, of Freedom, Beaver County — was sentenced in August to up to 16 years in prison for arranging sex parties that included underage girls and advertising them on Craigslist. He had been a girls basketball coach for the Little Bridger Basketball program in Ambridge.

Anyone with information about Teed's whereabouts is asked to the call the U.S. Marshals' Western Pennsylvania Fugitive Task Force at 412-422-4722 or 412-644-6628. Information also can be sent by email to wpaftf@comcast.net.

Tom Fontaine is a Tribune-Review assistant news editor.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me