ShareThis Page

Woman hurt in Braddock housing complex porch collapse

| Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

A woman suffered minor injuries when a porch slab collapsed Tuesday afternoon at a housing complex in Braddock.

Police said the woman stepped out onto the porch in the 1000 block of Mapleview Terrace when the concrete slab partially collapsed about 3 p.m. She suffered a minor foot injury and was transported to a hospital in good condition, Allegheny County Housing Authority Police Chief Mike Vogel said.

Jack McGraw, director of development for the housing authority, said staff were investigating the cause of the collapse and would inspect all the other porches in the complex. All were built around the same time, about 16 years ago, McGraw said.

The area underneath the porches is typically used as storage space for tenants, he said.

Neighbor Sanford Barnes said the victim had fallen into the broken slab and was calling for help when he came outside. He said she was a local crossing guard and was likely just returning from her duties when the collapse happened.

“I don't feel safe here,” he said, pointing toward the railroad tracks just beyond the buildings and courtyard. “There are major trains coming through here, shaking the foundations. The porch could just be the beginning.”

The Housing Authority posted a notice on the unit that it was unsafe until the porch could be shored up.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me