ShareThis Page

Grand jury indictment says Joseph Nocito Sr. hid money from IRS in mansion

Theresa Clift
| Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2018, 12:42 p.m.
An aerial photo of Joseph Nocito Sr.'s mansion in Bell Acres.
An aerial photo of Joseph Nocito Sr.'s mansion in Bell Acres.

A businessman has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of conspiracy and filing fraudulent income tax returns as he built his 34-room Bell Acres mansion.

The 10-count indictment alleges Joseph Nocito Sr., 76, conspired to conceal millions of dollars in personal income from the IRS by listing construction costs for his 39,000-square-foot mansion as business expenses of his companies, a Department of Justice news release states. He also created a system to transfer money among his companies to evade taxes, authorities said.

Allegheny County online property records say the three-story mansion has 12 bedrooms, 13 full bathrooms and eight half bathrooms. It also lists 22 fireplaces, a slate roof and an exterior made of stone.

Its assessed value is $4.25 million.

The charges have been expected since 2015, when the U.S. Attorney's Office filed charges against Ann E. Harris , Nocito's personal assistant.

Nocito is the former CEO and president of Pittsburgh-based Automated Health Systems Inc., a company that administered public health programs for state and local government.

The indictment also alleges Nocito concealed millions in AHS taxable revenue by shuffling millions between his other companies, including Northland Properties, Golden Triangle Leasing and Management Financial Services.

Nocito declined comment, but he has cooperated with the investigation since it began in 2010, Phillip DiLucente, Nocito's attorney, said in a news release.

The law provides for a total sentence of 32 years in prison, a fine of $2.5 million, or both, the release says.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669, or via Twitter @tclift.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me