ShareThis Page

Are Amazon reps in Pittsburgh? Mayor Bill Peduto thinks it's likely

Bob Bauder
| Wednesday, March 7, 2018, 3:18 p.m.

Pittsburgh Mayor Bill Peduto has yet to hear from Amazon about a visit, but he said company representatives are probably touring the city without his knowledge.

The Seattle-based e-commerce giant two weeks ago began sending officials to visit cities that are competing to attract the company's second headquarters. Pittsburgh is one of 20 finalists for Amazon's HQ2, which could bring 50,000 new jobs and $5 billion in investments to the city.

“I believe that they're probably here and will continue to be here without telling us,” Peduto said Wednesday. “I really don't expect that they're going to just come in for one visit. I'm assuming that when they get down through the proposals and start looking at all the different cities that they'll be in all the cities with different groups on a continual basis.”

Company representatives have toured Washington, Montgomery County in Maryland and Northern Virginia.

The Washington Post reported that Amazon officials had dinner with the D.C. mayor, breakfast with Virginia's governor and visited four sites in Northern Virginia.

Peduto said Amazon has called seeking city data, but officials have not said when they might visit Western Pennsylvania. He said he has no set plans for company representative when they arrive.

“I expect that they'll give us a very short window to prepare,” he said. “They haven't told us what they're looking for when they do (arrive), but I don't think they're looking for a dog-and-pony show.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312, or on Twitter @bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me