ShareThis Page

Steelers win $4M reimbursement for Heinz Field scoreboard installed last year

| Thursday, March 8, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

It's the offseason, but the Pittsburgh Steelers still managed to rack up another win at Heinz Field.

The Sports & Exhibition Authority — the agency that owns the stadium and leases it to the Steelers — agreed Thursday to reimburse the team up to $4 million to cover costs associated with installing a new south-end video scoreboard and a series of ribbon-style video screens on the north, east and west sides of the North Shore stadium.

Steelers President Art Rooney II complained last year that the authority wasn't willing to spend money on upgrades to the stadium that would allow the team to attract large events, such as the Super Bowl. Rooney said the Steelers and the authority, known as the SEA, didn't have a working relationship.

Documents show money for the $4 million reimbursement will come from a capital reserve account that is fed by surcharges paid by fans attending games and events at Heinz Field, which opened in 2001 to replace Three Rivers Stadium.

Mayor Bill Peduto said last year that Heinz Field patrons, not taxpayers, should have to pay for upgrades to the stadium. His office declined comment Thursday. Peduto is in Washington, D.C., attending a meeting of the Alliance 50x50 Commission on U.S. transportation sector efficiency, according to his public schedule.

The Heinz Field video board was installed in time for the start of the 2017-18 season. It's 41 feet high and 123.5 feet wide. It's huge, but among NFL video boards, it ranks among the smallest, according to stadium video board maker Daktronics .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me