ShareThis Page
Allegheny

Stallings buyout could cloud Pitt Day

Debra Erdley
| Thursday, March 8, 2018, 4:54 p.m.
Pitt head Kevin Stallings speaks to the media before practice Friday, Sept. 30, 2016 at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt head Kevin Stallings speaks to the media before practice Friday, Sept. 30, 2016 at Petersen Events Center.

University of Pittsburgh officials undoubtedly hope the imbroglio about the pricey buyout the school is negotiating to close the door on basketball coach Kevin Stallings' contract after a 0-18 record in ACC basketball blows over next week.

If it doesn't they might have some explaining to do when more than 300 faculty, staff and students descend on Harrisburg on March 20 to lobby lawmakers on behalf of the school.

Times are tough at Pitt, they'll tell lawmakers. The state is slated to flat fund the school that has a $2.2 billion budget is slated again this year. And that's only if things go well and lawmakers accept the Gov. Tom Wolf's recommendation that they set aside $146.7 million for the quasi-public research university.

The University Times reports that uncertainty over state subsidies after the state was four months late with the check last year, has prompted some staffers to participate in the road trip for the first time this year.

Paul A. Supowitz, vice chancellor for community and governmental relations, even provides participants with a fact sheet outlining Pitt's myriad contributions to the community.

No words yet on how they are going to explain a multi-million dollar payout to the coach who couldn't pull out a win. But odds are they will rely on that old favorite: the boosters are paying for it.

Hail Pitt.

Debra Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-320-7996 or derdley@tribweb.com or via Twitter @deberdley_trib

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me