ShareThis Page
Allegheny

Ex-North Versailles karate instructor on trial on charges of molestation

Megan Guza
| Tuesday, April 10, 2018, 11:24 a.m.
Michael Scherbanic, owner of Tang Soo Do Karate College in North Versailles, leads a class through warm-up exercises on Saturday, February 17, 2007.
Tribune-Review
Michael Scherbanic, owner of Tang Soo Do Karate College in North Versailles, leads a class through warm-up exercises on Saturday, February 17, 2007.
Michael Scherbanic
Submitted
Michael Scherbanic

A former karate instructor is on trial in Allegheny County facing accusations of molesting five students and then attempting to persuade his cellmate to partake in an intricate plot to defame, discredit and ultimately kill the accusers.

Michael Scherbanic, 30, was originally charged in June 2016 with molesting a former student he taught at Tang Soo Do Karate College in North Versailles.

More students came forward with similar accusations, resulting in five counts each of indecent assault, child endangerment and corruption of minors; four counts of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse with a victim younger than 16; three counts of indecent exposure; and one count each of witness intimidation and obstruction.

The abuse allegedly began as early as the mid-2000s.

Testimony began Monday in the case that also includes 27 counts of criminal solicitation.

In February 2017, Scherbanic attempted to solicit his cellmate at the Allegheny County Jail to kill his accusers in a plot that involved hand-drawn maps, a list of code names, Molotov cocktails and other explosives and instructions on how to frame one alleged victim as a drug dealer, authorities said.

Scherbanic's cellmate turned over documents to investigators and wore a wire during his final meeting with the karate instructor, according to authorities.

Central to the alleged plot was a four-page document that contained hand-drawn maps and instructions for John Doe 6 and John Doe 7 — two former karate students. They were to make false reports indicating that Jane Doe 2, a grandmother of an alleged victim, told them to say they were sexually assaulted by Scherbanic.

Charging documents outlined a timeline for the cellmate once he was released from jail: “Get funds, do recon, buy supplies, buy burner phones x 11, call John Doe 9 and John Doe 11, frame John Doe 2, Snapchat John Does 6 and 7, find out results of Jane Doe 2's call to John Does 6 and 7 (if police were informed), place second call from John Doe 4's family to John Doe 7, execute Order 66 with as many as possible.”

John Does 1 through 5 are alleged victims, John Does 6 through 8 are former karate students, and John Does 9 and 11 are friends of Scherbanic's. Order 66 is the act of killing the victims, according to the complaint.

Testimony continued Tuesday in front of Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Donna Jo McDaniel.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8519, mguza@tribweb.com or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me