ShareThis Page

Suspended Pittsburgh-area deacon waives hearing on child sex allegations

Megan Guza
| Monday, April 16, 2018, 4:18 p.m.
Deacon Rosendo “Ross” Dacal
Deacon Rosendo “Ross” Dacal

A suspended Pittsburgh-area deacon waived his right to a preliminary hearing in Washington County on Monday on charges that he sent sexually explicit messages and photos to a police officer posing online as a teenage boy.

Court records show that Deacon Rosendo “Ross” Dacal, 73, waived that hearing. A formal arraignment is scheduled for May 24.

Dacal, a deacon in the Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh, was arrested April 10 on five felony charges, including solicitation of child pornography, criminal use of communications and unlawful contact with a minor.

“We will address the merits of the case at the trial level, not the preliminary hearing,” said Dacal's attorney, Robert Del Greco Jr. “These are serious charges, and we are treating them as such.”

Dacal had served the All Saints Parish it Etna since 2011. Bishop David Zubik suspended him last week. His security clearances at the Allegheny County Jail, where he was a chaplain, have been revoked.

North Strabane police Officer Gary Scherer was monitoring a chat room in December and posing as a 14-year-old boy, according to a criminal complaint,

The complaint said a man later identified as Dacal exchanged hundreds of messages with Scherer in the chatroom and via other social media between Dec. 20 and Monday.

“Many of these messages were sexually explicit and graphic in nature,” including ones in which Dacal solicited naked photographs, Scherer wrote in the complaint.

Dacal also sent sexually explicit videos, the complaint said.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me