ShareThis Page

Pittsburgh police probe officer's social media posting

Joe Napsha
| Saturday, June 23, 2018, 9:09 a.m.

The Pittsburgh police command staff is investigating an officer's Facebook posting, saying it would not tolerate comments disparaging victims, the department said Friday.

The police department did not describe the nature of the post or who is the target of the investigation by the Office of Municipal Investigations.

“We will hold this officer accountable for his actions. Comments that disparage victims and endanger the community and fellow officers will not be tolerated by the City of Pittsburgh. Such behavior is a poor reflection on the bureau and will not be tolerated,” the department said in a statement.

The Office of Municipal Investigations is responsible for coordinating the investigation of citizen complaints of alleged misconduct by city employees, including uniformed employees such as the police, fire and emergency medical services.

The department would not comment beyond the statement it released, police spokesman Chris Togneri said.

But Robert Swartzwelder, president of the Pittsburgh Fraternal Order of Police, criticized the department for issuing a statement. “Any public discussion of an internal investigation is a complete violation of departmental regulations.”

Not only is it a violation of departmental regulations, Swartzwelder said Saturday, it is a violation of the FOP's contract with the city.

The Office of Municipal Investigations is run by civilians, Swartzwelder said.

Swartzwelder said he was not aware of the content of the Facebook posting from the unnamed officer.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-5252 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me