ShareThis Page

Antwon Rose protesters shut down Route 30 in North Versailles

| Sunday, July 8, 2018, 6:39 p.m.
Protesters were along Lincoln Highway in North Versailles in the name of Antwon Rose on Sunday, July 8, 2018.
Protesters were along Lincoln Highway in North Versailles in the name of Antwon Rose on Sunday, July 8, 2018.

Traffic on Route 30 was being disrupted by protesters in North Versailles on Sunday.

The protesters were demonstrating in the name of Antwon Rose, the unarmed 17-year-old who was shot and killed by an East Pittsburgh police officer June 19 .

The Tribune-Review's news partner, WPXI-TV, reported that the protesters were at one point headed toward East Pittsburgh across the Westinghouse Bridge.

North Versailles police refused to release any information Sunday about reports that a person was arrested after driving through the protesters, injuring four of them. An officer said repeatedly that only the chief could release information, between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m. weekdays.

Allegheny County authorities were not involved, county spokeswoman Amie Downs said.

On June 29, Pittsburgh police charged Gregory Wagner, 58, of Bell Acres with recklessly endangering another person and traffic violations after he allegedly drove through a crowd of Rose protesters on the city's North Shore on June 22.

Later Sunday, protesters in East Pittsburgh were converging at the home of the police chief, WPXI reported.

Officer Michael Rosfeld, 30, of Penn Hills has been charged with criminal homicide in Rose's death.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me