ShareThis Page
Allegheny

North Hills instructor named Pennsylvania History Teacher of the Year

Tony LaRussa
| Tuesday, July 10, 2018, 8:18 a.m.

A teacher in the North Hills School District has been selected as the 2018 Pennsylvania History Teacher of the Year by a national education organization.

Joe Welch, who teaches 8th grade social studies at North Hills Middle School, received the honor from the Gilder Lehrman Institute of American History. He was selected by a panel of teachers, administrators and scholars from throughout the state for his achievements in American history education.

The award is present annually by the New York-based institute, which is the nation’s leading organization dedicated to K-12 American history education.

Welch will receive a $1,000 cash award, an archive of books and historical resources for the middle school library and the opportunity to attend a Gilder Lehrman teaching seminar next year.

Welch is one of 53 finalists for the institute’s National History Teacher of the Year Award, which will be announced in October.

Welch has gained a reputation for using creative and innovative projects to bring American history alive for his students, according to district officials.

His philosophy for teaching history, which was included in the application process, is based on students creating stories and publishing content.

Students in Welch’s classroom have the opportunity to create animated videos, remix songs to analyze an era of American history and create illustrated children’s books to explain primary sources of historic information.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me