ShareThis Page
Allegheny

Sewickley Academy freshman Cox values experience at USRowing development camp

| Saturday, July 14, 2018, 12:45 a.m.
Sewickley Academy rower Georgia Cox (middle) takes part in a competition.
Submitted
Sewickley Academy rower Georgia Cox (middle) takes part in a competition.

Sewickley Academy rising freshman Georgia Cox took a step toward one day making a national rowing team.

Cox, 14, participated in the USRowing Women’s U17 Development June 18-July 9 in Connecticut.

The camp was for young athletes seen as having potential. Cox, a member of the Three Rivers Junior Rowing team on Washington’s Landing, was one of 51 rowers and coxswains invited.

Cox said the camp was very intense, but an amazing opportunity.

“I am very happy to be (a part) of this camp because I know it will help me achieve my goal,” she said.

Three Rivers Junior Rowing coach Matt Grau said Cox engaged in a challenging training plan.

Cox, a former swimmer, placed first in the youth novice girls event over the winter at the Pittsburgh Indoor Rowing Championship. She came in second at the North Allegheny Indoor Rowing Championship.

Quaker Valley departing senior Tessa Kimmy fell just short of making the national team.

Kimmy, a Tennessee recruit, was invited to the first phase of the Women’s U19 Selection/Training Camp in Connecticut. Athletes picked for the second phase will represent the U.S. at the the World Rowing Junior Championships Aug. 8-12, in the Czech Republic.

Quaker Valley rising junior Ben Farnan participated in a U17 Men’s Racing Camp in Oregon.

The camp prepared athletes to compete for a spot on a national team. Campers raced at the club national championships July 11-15 in New Jersey.

Karen Kadilak is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me