ShareThis Page

Ross to add signal to ease rush-hour gridlock near Reis Run Road landslide

Tony LaRussa
| Tuesday, Aug. 7, 2018, 1:27 p.m.
A temporary traffic signal similar to the one pictured here is being used to ease gridlock near the site of a landslide along Reis Run Road in Ross.
A temporary traffic signal similar to the one pictured here is being used to ease gridlock near the site of a landslide along Reis Run Road in Ross.

Anybody who travels Reis Run Road in Ross where a landslide reduced the roadway to a single lane knows the evening rush hour there is nothing short of torture.

But relief is on the way.

Commissioner Joe Laslavic said the current system of using a stop sign to control alternating traffic from both directions where the road is only one lane is to blame during the evening rush.

“This take-your-turn, one-at-a-time is not working,” he said. “It’s absolute gridlock up there, it’s awful.”

Township commissioners on Monday voted to authorize temporary traffic-control measures near the slide to try to ease the pain during the estimated two months it is expected to clear the slide.

Manager Doug Sample said today that a crew is on scene to install a temporary traffic signal along the road.

The signal will be employed weekdays from 3:30 to 6 p.m. to allow a greater number of vehicles to move through the slide area at a time.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368 or or via Twitter @TonyLaRussaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me