ShareThis Page

Boy, 14, accused of carjacking spree in Pittsburgh

| Wednesday, Aug. 8, 2018, 11:51 a.m.

A 14-year-old boy wore the same shirt when he carjacked two vehicles this week, according to Pittsburgh police.

The teen was arrested Tuesday in connection with a carjacking spree after police caught him and four others fleeing from a stolen car in Homewood, according to a Pittsburgh police news release.

A couple of alert citizens helped in the arrest, said Chris Togneri, public information officer.

A 66-year-old man was assaulted and removed from his Subaru Forester at 1:45 p.m. Tuesday by three teens on Reynolds Street in Point Breeze. A person nearby in Frick Park took a photograph of the suspects moments before the carjacking, police said.

Investigators notified construction crews in the Homewood area to keep an eye out for the vehicle after it was seen traveling in that direction. They did.

About three hours later, a construction worker flagged down officers in Homewood who were able to catch up to the vehicle. Five teens — a girl and four boys — fled on foot on Monticello Street near Brushton Avenue and were arrested by officers.

The 14-year-old boy was identified as the driver, police said.

He also faces charges for allegedly carjacking two vehicles Monday, one from a 75-year-old man on South Murtland Avenue in Point Breeze and the second from a 70-year-old woman in a parking garage at Bakery Square in the East End, police said.

Surveillance photographs from Bakery Square show that the teen was wearing the same shirt as in the photo taken prior to Tuesday’s carjacking, police said.

The teen is being held in Shuman Juvenile Detention Center.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me