ShareThis Page
Allegheny

N.J. man accused of plotting to sell heroin in Pittsburgh area

Natasha Lindstrom
| Wednesday, Aug. 8, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

A federal grand jury has accused a New Jersey man of plotting to sell heroin in the Pittsburgh region, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said Wednesday.

Marvin Anthony, 41, of East Orange, N.J., was indicted on one count of possession with the intent to distribute more than 100 grams of heroin, Brady said. Anthony’s aliases include Kareem Anthony, Jamal Atwaters, Robert Jackson, Rasha Miller, Marvin Armstrong and Rasha Tyrner.

Officials found Anthony to be in possession of heroin on March 5, the indictment said.

If convicted, Anthony faces a maximum sentence of 10 years to life in prison and a fine of up to $8 million.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Ross E. Lenhardt is prosecuting the case.

Brady credited law enforcement agencies from across the region with cooperating to make “opioid traffickers a specific target within the entire Western District of Pennsylvania.”

The investigation that led to the indictment against Anthony involved the Drug Enforcement Administration, state Attorney General’s Office, Washington County’s drug task force and District Attorney’s Office, Pennsylvania State Police and law enforcement officials from Canonsburg, Donora, Monessen, Charleroi and Washington County.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, nlindstrom@tribweb.com or via Twitter @NewsNatasha.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me