ShareThis Page

Florida trio charged with making, passing bogus checks

Jeff Himler
| Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2018, 9:00 p.m.

Three Florida residents are accused of stealing U.S. mail as part of an alleged counterfeit check scheme based last year in North Fayette Township.

Cheryl Brown, 48, of Riverview, Fla., and Calar Braxton, 44, and Brian Omar Campbell, 28, both of Orlando, Fla., are named as defendants in a seven-count indictment returned Tuesday by a federal grand jury in Pittsburgh.

Charges in the case include conspiracy to commit offenses against the United States, possession of stolen mail and possessing and uttering counterfeit securities.

According to information presented in the case, the three defendants checked into a local hotel on Oct. 5, 2017, and allegedly stole and opened mail belonging to area residents.

They recorded account and routing numbers from checks found in the stolen mail and used them to produce counterfeit bank checks, officials said.

The trio then allegedly used the bogus checks on Oct. 5 and 6, 2017, to buy merchandise from such retailers as Victoria’s Secret, Dick’s Sporting Goods and Macy’s department store.

The case was investigated by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service and North Fayette Township Police, who ended the scheme when they obtained a warrant and searched the hotel. Authorities say they recovered a laser printer, stolen mail and blank stock used for printing checks.

According to officials, the defendants have used various aliases. Braxton is also known as Vivian Hugo or Taylor Crimson; Campbell as Vincent Hugo or Troy Crimson, and Brown as Loraine Johnson.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, or via Twitter @jhimler_news.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me