ShareThis Page
Allegheny

Lindsey Williams edges out Jeremy Shaffer for 38th State Senate seat

Madasyn Czebiniak
| Tuesday, Nov. 6, 2018, 9:18 p.m.
Lindsey Williams thanks supporters during her victory speech on Tuesday, Nov 6, 2018.
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Lindsey Williams thanks supporters during her victory speech on Tuesday, Nov 6, 2018.
Jeremy Schaffer waits for votes to be counted at the Hampton Presbyterian Church Tuesday Nov 6, 2018
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Jeremy Schaffer waits for votes to be counted at the Hampton Presbyterian Church Tuesday Nov 6, 2018
Lindsey Williams views the pole numbers with Pa Political Director, Andi Perez, and Campaign Chair Person Ryan Morden, Tuesday Nov 6, 2018. at the Operating Engineers Hall in RIDC Park.
Williams seeÕs that she was won her home precinct in West View District 3.
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Lindsey Williams views the pole numbers with Pa Political Director, Andi Perez, and Campaign Chair Person Ryan Morden, Tuesday Nov 6, 2018. at the Operating Engineers Hall in RIDC Park. Williams seeÕs that she was won her home precinct in West View District 3.
38th Pennsylvania Senate District: Lindsey Williams, Democrat. Jeremy Shaffer, Republican.
38th Pennsylvania Senate District: Lindsey Williams, Democrat. Jeremy Shaffer, Republican.

Democrat Lindsey Williams scored a narrow victory Tuesday over Republican Jeremy Shaffer in a race to represent much of northern Allegheny County in Pennsylvania’s State Senate.

Williams collected 50.1 percent of the votes cast compared with Shaffer’s 49.7 percent with all of the district’s precincts reporting unofficial results, according to the Allegheny County Elections Division. The district includes a large portion of the Alle-Kiski Valley, a small section of Pittsburgh and suburban communities in Alle­gheny County’s North Hills.

Williams and Shaffer were separated by just 549 votes, the unofficial tallies showed. There were 294 write-ins.

Williams said the victory was overwhelming. She gave her victory speech shortly before 11:50 p.m.

“I’m proud of the campaign I’ve run and the volunteers that have worked so hard to knock on doors and make phone calls and talk to as many voters as possible,” said Williams, 35, of West View.

She said she will fight for working families, increase investment in public schools, establish good jobs that provide livable wages for families and make sure everyone has access to quality, affordable health care.

Shaffer conceded to Williams early Wednesday.

Williams serves as communications and political director for the 3,000-member Pittsburgh Federation of Teachers. She had never previously run for public office. Shaffer, 41, is a Ross commissioner who works as an executive with the software development company Bentley Systems.

Their race was one of only four across Pennsylvania where an incumbent state senator wasn’t on the November ballot. Shaffer defeated incumbent state Sen. Randy Vulakovich, R-Shaler, in the May primary.

A lot of money was poured into the race.

Shaffer’s campaign raised just more than $1 million and spent $884,442 through Oct. 22, and it had nearly $150,000 in the bank, according to state campaign finance records posted online. Williams’ campaign raised $770,163, and spent $410,859 through Oct. 22. Close to $360,000 remained in the bank as of Oct. 22.

In the days leading up to the election, Shaffer’s campaign raised roughly $262,000, of which the Republican candidate contributed more than $100,000 of his own money. Williams’ campaign raised roughly $120,000.

The campaign was marked by attack ads and mailings.

Republicans branded Williams as a radical socialist who wants to raise taxes. Two district residents even tried to have her removed from the ballot, claiming she hadn’t lived in the district for the constitutionally required four years. The lawsuit was thrown out last month.

Williams said she joined the Democratic Socialists of America as she sought their local chapter’s endorsement in the Democratic primary. She didn’t receive it.

Democrats accused Shaffer of breaking campaign finance rules, and one attack mailing claiming Shaffer wants to cut public school funding included a Photoshopped image of him holding a chainsaw.

Shaffer said during the campaign that the Legislature needs to be downsized, he would not accept perks such as a free state car, and he supports term limits for state lawmakers. He also said claims that he would cut education funding are lies and he supports maintaining funding for public education.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, mczebiniak@tribweb.com, or via Twitter @maddyczebstrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me