ShareThis Page

Who does Ben Roethlisberger say is the Steelers' No. 1 wide receiver?

Chris Adamski
| Wednesday, Nov. 28, 2018, 2:54 p.m.
Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown (84) embraces quarterback Ben Roethlisberger (7) prior to an NFL football game against the Denver Broncos, Sunday, Nov. 25, 2018, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)
Pittsburgh Steelers wide receiver Antonio Brown (84) embraces quarterback Ben Roethlisberger (7) prior to an NFL football game against the Denver Broncos, Sunday, Nov. 25, 2018, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

With the season more than two-thirds complete and JuJu Smith-Schuster with more receiving yards and catches than Antonio Brown, the subject has been broached in regards to whether Brown remains the Pittsburgh Steelers’ No. 1 wide receiver .

Brown had more catches between 2013-17 than any player over a five-season span in NFL history, but this season his 71 receptions trail the second-year Smith-Schuster’s 77. Brown’s yardage total of 874 also lags well behind the 22-year-old Smith-Schuster’s 1,055.

So who does the man that throws to the two dynamic pass-catchers think is his No. 1 option in 2018?

Is that Ben Roethlisberger sidestepped the question telling in itself?

“It feels like we have a bunch of No. 1 receivers,” the veteran quarterback said Wednesday. “I’d put (running back) James Conner in there. (Tight end) Vance McDonald. (Slot receiver/running back) Ryan Switzer. A.B. So, I’d put a lot of them as No. 1’s.”

Asked more directly, as a follow-up, if the 30-year-old Brown remains his top option, Roethlisberger further demurred.

“A No. 1 is a No. 1, so I am going to put all those at No. 1,” Roethlisberger said. “I am going to put all of those guys at No. 1, so I have a lot of top choices.”

For what it’s worth, even Los Angeles Chargers coach Anthony Lynn during a conference call with Pittsburgh media Wednesday made reference to Roethlisberger’s “two No. 1 wide receivers.”

The Steelers (7-3-1) host the Chargers (8-3) on Sunday night.

Roethlisberger was critical of the route Brown ran on the final offensive play of Sunday’s loss at Denver, saying on his weekly 93.7 FM radio segment Tuesday that Brown “drifted” in the end zone on a pass that was intercepted and essentially ended the game.

That was the ninth pass this season targeted for Brown that has been intercepted, the most of any receiver in the NFL.

During the same radio segment as well as after Sunday’s game, Roethlisberger also praised Smith-Schuster. “He is reliable, dependable and trustworthy; I know he is going to be in the right spot,” Roethlisberger said Sunday.

On Tuesday on 93.7 FM, Roethlisberger said he “wish(ed) we would have gone back to JuJu for four straight plays” on that final fateful drive.

Brown’s succinct explanation of what he saw on the interception thrown to him Sunday: “All I saw was an interception.”

Brown remains on a pace to have 103 catches for 1,271 yards, numbers that would be his worst on a per-game basis since the 2012 season. But his 11 receiving touchdowns in 2018 are tied for the NFL lead and are on pace for a career-best.

Hey, Steelers Nation, get the latest news about the Pittsburgh Steelers here .

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me