ShareThis Page
Allegheny

North Hills elementary teacher accused of touching girl ordered to stand trial

Tony LaRussa
| Thursday, Dec. 13, 2018, 5:45 a.m.
Nathan Buttenfield
Nathan Buttenfield

A teacher in the North Hills School District will stand trial on charges he inappropriately touched a young girl in his class.

District Judge Richard Opiela ordered Nathan Buttenfield, 41, of Gibsonia to stand trial on charges of indecent assault, institutional sexual assault, unlawful contact with a minor, child endangerment and corruption of a minor following a preliminary hearing on Wednesday.

In early November, Ross police charged Buttenfield, who teaches physical education and health at Highcliff Elementary, after the child told her parents that he inappropriately touched her during a gym activity, police said.

Buttenfield teaches children in kindergarten through sixth grade.

Buttenfield was released on $50,000 unsecured bond following his arrest and has been on unpaid leave from the district.

The girl testified that Buttenfield “was rubbing me” with his hands on her “private parts, front and back. When I tried to run, he pulled me back,” according to Tribune-Review news partners WPXI-TV.

Buttenfield has denied the accusations and his lawyer said the girl appears to have been “coached.”

“It was incredibly obvious the child was coached,” said defense attorney Bill Diffenderfer. “When I see a young girl like this testify as smoothly as she did, I am very curious as to how that happens.”

The judge said some of the child’s testimony is inconsistent, but said she never wavered when it came to the rubbing, so he ordered the teacher to stand trial, according to the TV station.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368 or tlarussa@tribweb.com or via Twitter @TonyLaRussaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me