ShareThis Page

Bridgeville historical society focuses on Washington's trip to present-day Erie

| Friday, April 20, 2018, 11:00 p.m.

The Bridgeville Area Historical Society interrupted its series of “Second Tuesday” workshops dealing with the history of Bridgeville High School this month and focused instead on George Washington's 1753 mission to Fort Le Boeuf.

The society recently submitted a proposal for funding to establish a significant permanent exhibit dedicated to George Washington's seven visits to Western Pennsylvania in the 18th century and the impact they had on this area.

In support of this proposal, we decided to dedicate a series of the “Second Tuesdays” to the preparation of videos dedicated to these visits.

The facilitator presented a chronological series of slides depicting the 1753 adventure.

In the 18th century both France and England laid claim to the Ohio Country.

In 1753, the French exploited their claim with a major invasion. They established three major forts — Presque Isle (Erie), LeBoeuf (Waterford), and Machault (Franklin). The fort (Duquesne) at the forks of the Ohio was scheduled for construction and occupation in 1754.

In response, Virginia Gov. Robert Dinwiddie dispatched 21-year-old Maj. George Washington to the Ohio Country to deliver an ultimatum to the French advising them that England (Virginia) had sovereignty over that land. Washington engaged experienced scout and frontiersman Christopher Gist to accompany him.

Gist and Washington traveled on horseback to Logstown (now Ambridge) where a major Indian village existed. They spent several days there, meeting leaders and acquiring intelligence about the French, and then proceeded north.

When they reached Fort Machault, the French commander there advised them to continue on to Fort Le­Boeuf, where they met Commandant Legardeur de St. Pierre.

Washington presented Dinwiddie's letter to St. Pierre, then waited three days before he got a formal reply. He spent the time profitably, generating a detailed report on the layout of the fort, the number and location of artillery pieces, and the disposition of the troops manning it.

Eventually the French presented their response, a courteous but arrogant statement that the combination of their might and their claims made it obvious that the Ohio Country was an inherent part of New France. They strongly advised the English to be satisfied to stay east of the Allegheny mountains.

The trip back to the Forks of the Ohio was full of adventure. An Indian took a shot at Washington and Gist at short range but missed. Later Washington fell off a raft trying to cross the ice-filled Allegheny River and nearly drowned. They eventually made their way back to Virginia and safety.

Back in Williamsburg, Washington was received as a hero, and the Virginians' resolve to resist the French invasion was intensified. The stage was set for the young major to make his second trip to this area and to kick off the “first World War.”

This is indeed a remarkable story; its sequel will be investigated in June. The May “Second Tuesday” workshop — set for May 8 — will return to our review of the history of Bridgeville High School, this time focusing on the 1950 and 1951 classes.

John Oyler is a Tribune-Review contributing writer. He can be reached at 412-343-1652 or Read more from him at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me