ShareThis Page

Carnegie council rebids basketball court project

| Sunday, Oct. 14, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

Carnegie council unanimously voted to rebid the construction of a basketball court in Carnegie Park for $68,680. The measure was approved in a 4-0 vote, with council members Michael Sarsfield and Tess Rem-Canofari absent from the meeting.

Council voted to reject the original bid, which was bid out for nearly twice the amount of money, at its September meeting. Grant funding from the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources will cover half of the final cost of the basketball court project.

The project is part of the second phase of a years-long initiative to upgrade the park and consists of the demolition of an older court and construction of a new fenced-in area. Upgrades to the park have so far included the addition of a dog park, hockey courts, tennis courts and a playground. Grants from DCNR will cover half the cost.

Matthew Guerry is a Tribune-Review contributor.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me