ShareThis Page
Carnegie/Bridgeville

Scott resident part of first Lunar Landing history

| Friday, Oct. 19, 2018, 1:33 p.m.
Mike Suley, of Scott Township, poses beside a letter he received from Neil Armstrong in 1969 that agrees with Suley, who was 19 at the time, about using a United States flag for the first Lunar Landing.
Mike Suley, of Scott Township, poses beside a letter he received from Neil Armstrong in 1969 that agrees with Suley, who was 19 at the time, about using a United States flag for the first Lunar Landing.

The responses that Mike Suley received to the letters he wrote in early 1969 all contained pretty standard boilerplate language. President Richard Nixon, then-U.S. Sens. Richard Schweiker and Hugh Scott and other officials each thanked him for his note, assured him that they would consider it, and reiterated their dedication to the country.

None of the replies really acknowledged his belief that it should be an American flag that the Apollo 11 crew plants on the moon save for the one.

“I appreciate your recommendation and do, in fact, agree with them in general,” Neil Armstrong wrote back in April 1969, just three months before the moon landing.

“I think you will be pleased with the final outcome,” he continued.

According to a 1993 NASA contractor report, the agency briefly considered flying a United Nations flag on the moon in light of a speech Nixon gave in 1969 that stressed the “international flavor” of the Apollo missions. Suley, then 19 and living in Point Breeze, was compelled by the press speculation over the matter to request that Armstrong and others use their influence to see that an American flag be flown instead.

“We invested all the money. We had 400,000 Americans involved,” Suley, 69, of Scott Township, said. “We would end the space race decisively if we were to go up there and put that flag on the moon and walk around.”

Suley, a self-described “space geek,” recalled his eyes welling with tears upon receiving the letter and hoping Armstrong’s words would prove true. At the time Armstrong wrote back, Suley said he knew only that he was commander of the mission, not that he would be the first man to walk on the moon.

He said he never doubted that the letter was genuine and in the early 2000s had an appraiser verify its authenticity. Suley said his appraiser put him in contact with Auburn University Professor James Hansen, whom he said used the letter in researching “First Man,” a biography of Armstrong on which a new film is based.

The original copy is being displayed on loan at the Senator John Heinz History Center as part of a current exhibit on Apollo 11. Beside the letter are blank pages on which patrons are invited to share their memories of the moon landing.

“It was a seminal moment for people not just across the country but around the world, and a lot of them have memories related to it,” said Anne Madarasz, curatorial director at Heinz History Center. “We use it as a way to invite people to share their remembrances about what that moment meant to them.”

Matthew Guerry is a Tribune-Review contributor.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me