Bridgeville officials to address parking problems |

Bridgeville officials to address parking problems


Parking in the northern section of Bridgeville Borough has long been a source of frustration for residents of St. Clair Street and Prestley Road.

Council members passed a resolution requesting Bridgeville Parking Authority explore options for more public parking in the area.

Rob McMaster, a resident of St. Clair Street, said in the warmer months it is not uncommon to be forced to park blocks from his home. He said on the weekend he tries to stay at home because he knows he will not find close parking.

“Saturdays are a no-go,” McMaster said.

Council members agreed parking is a problem in that part of the borough, but cautioned they do not have the answer yet. Many did express a willingness to find a space for a public lot.

“This is not an easy solution to a tough problem. But we need to try,” council member Bill Henderson said.

Some residents also expressed concern about more cars from a new business in the borough. Council approved the site plan for Pittsburgh Pets to operate a pet crematorium at 131 Washington Ave. The building is between Washington’s intersections with St. Clair and Prestley. Council approved a conditional use of the crematorium in February. At the time, owner/operator Dr. Tamara Padgelek said it will not be combined with her service Pittsburgh Pets at Home, which specializes in home euthanasia and hospice for pets. Padgelek also said she will offer no other services, such as a veterinary practice, at the facility.

• Bridgeville residents waiting for their street to be paved will have to wait a little longer. Borough council unanimously voted to reject the bids for the 2019 paving program. Bids received for the project were between $196,768 and $232,413. The 2019 borough budget allocates $150,837. Council member Bruce Ghelarducci said the scope of work will be trimmed and sent out for bids again.

Categories: Local | Carlynton
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.