Carlynton considers communication software purchase |

Carlynton considers communication software purchase

Carlynton Cougars mascot statue

Carlynton officials are considering whether a paperless way of communicating with each other and the community is worth the annual costs associated with the software.

School board members were presented a video presentation about BoardDocs, software that is becoming popular among school boards and municipal governments, said Andrew Klein, who conducted the video conference for the district.

Klein said more than 3,000 governing bodies nationwide use BoardDocs, including Pittsburgh-area school districts like North Allegheny, North Hills, Quaker Valley and Franklin Regional.

“It’s a centralized location for everything related to the board,” said Klein, who called the software a one-stop shop. “The real value is streamlining the administration work.”

Two editions are available, based on a district’s needs. With Board Docs LT, officials can manage agendas and policies, use with phones and tablets, operate with the cloud rather than local servers and have 24/7 customer support.

BoardDocs Pro offers the LT package plus events management, board member pages and packets, multi-user authoring and approvals and a deep library management.

The public can view documents, such as meeting agendas and policies. Administrators and board members would have a private section for personnel items.

The LT edition has an approximate fee of $2,000. The Pro edition is around $10,000. BoardDocs offers unlimited training hours so officials can get the most out of the software program.

Carlynton board President Jim Schriver said if the board decides to use BoardDocs, he would prefer starting with the LT edition.

Klein said most districts use the Pro edition, but can start with the LT and later upgrade.

“Either way, you will save hours of time,” Klein said.

Categories: Local | Carlynton
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.